Amy Stevens vs Sarah Mildren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Aug at 01:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Stevens vs S. Mildren

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stevens 1 - 0 Mildren
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amy Stevens winning 2 and Sarah Mildren winning 0. The last match between Amy Stevens and Sarah Mildren was at the W15 Tweed Heads, 15-08-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Amy Stevens getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stevens | 1 |
| Mildren | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Tweed Heads(08-15-25)
A. Stevens vs S. Mildren H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.57% (17-18) | Career Total W/L | 44.44% (8-10) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Stevens vs S. Mildren Match Preview:
- Mildren has a significantly stronger second serve performance, winning 37.34% of points in recent form, compared to Stevens' 21.62%. Does this make Mildren a stronger server? It seems likely.
- When it comes to returning games, Stevens excels in second serve points, winning 56% compared to Mildren's 42.86%. First serve return stats are almost equal, with Stevens slightly ahead at 26.19% versus Mildren's 26.03%.
- Under pressure, Mildren shows resilience by saving 47.25% of breakpoints, whereas Stevens has a breakpoint save percentage of 40%.
- Over the last year, Mildren has a modest win rate of 53.85%, slightly outperforming Stevens' 50% win rate.
- Surface preferences differ; Mildren thrives on Grass with a 60% win rate, while Stevens prefers Hard courts, holding a 52% win rate.
- Match levels indicate Mildren competes in higher-tier Challengers/ITF tournaments, with a 50% success rate. Stevens also has a 50% rate but at lower-tier events, such as Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments.
- In terms of opponent quality, Mildren's average competition rank is 397, much less challenging than Stevens, whose opponents average around a rank of 74.92.
- Deciding set capability leans heavily toward Mildren, who claims victory in all such scenarios recently, compared to Stevens' 60% success rate.
- Stevens has a more effective breakpoint conversion, achieving 30% in recent form, while Mildren converts at a rate of 21.95%.
Editorial Prediction (August 15, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Mildren and Stevens presents a fascinating matchup of contrasting strengths and strategic approaches. Mildren's superior second serve and ability to secure deciding sets provide a solid foundation, potentially benefiting from mental fortitude and technical prowess under pressure.
While Stevens excels in converting breakpoints and returning second serves, which could pressure Mildren's serve, Mildren's advantage on Grass and recent success against comparable opponents cannot be overlooked.
Though Stevens faces tougher opponents generally, the stats suggest Mildren might capitalize on their serve and breakpoint resilience. The prediction leans toward Mildren securing a win in this encounter.
Amy Stevens vs Sarah Mildren Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Stevens vs S. Mildren H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:46:48 | Average Match Time | 1:46:48 |
| 50% (26/52) | 1st Serve % | 52% (39/75) |
| 62% (16/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) |
| 58% (15/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (13/36) |
| 35% (6/17) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 55% (41/75) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Stevens Recent Matches Played
S. Mildren Recent Matches Played

A. Stevens vs S. Mildren Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.57% (17/18) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.44% (8/10) |
| 48.72% (38/40) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.11% (16/22) |
| 50.35% (357/352) | Games Win/Loss | 47.30% (140/156) |
| 48.57% (17/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 31 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.53 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 182 | Total Double Faults | 48 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:38 |
| 126.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 389 |
| 51% (639/1252) | 1st Serve % | 60% (511/852) |
| 64% (407/639) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (313/511) |
| 40% (246/613) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (148/341) |
| 49% (84/172) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (52/107) |
| 47% (603/1272) | Return Points Win % | 46% (375/818) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 48.48% (16/17) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 48% (16/33) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (4/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 87% (15/13) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (7/7) |
| 13% (15/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (7/0) |
| 20% (20/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (11/1) |